The Chatah Assassination and Lebanon’s Three Wars

BEIRUT - Lebanon has been jolted into fresh political crisis and fear today after a car bomb in central Beirut this morning assassinated Mohamad Chatah, a prominent March 14 group political ally and adviser to former Prime Minister Saad Hariri. While such attacks have been a sad part of Lebanese political culture since the 1970s, the target, timing and location of the attack are noteworthy, and perhaps shed light on the possible perpetrators and purpose of the criminal deed, which killed at least four others and injured over 70 people.
The attack should probably be analyzed at three levels simultaneously: the domestic confrontation between the March 14 and March 8 groups, the armed conflict to bring down or save the Syrian regime next door, and the wider ideological conflict across the Middle East that is driven to a large extent by Iran and Saudi Arabia. Killing Chatah at this time and in the heart of March 14’s political terrain in West Beirut echoes elements of all three conflicts.
Lebanon has been gripped by political stagnation in its formal governance institutions for much of the past year, as the parliament, the cabinet and the national dialog have all been moribund due to a deep ideological divide between the Hariri-led March 14 forces that are close to Saudi Arabia, and the Hizbullah-led March 8 camp that is close to Syria and Iran. Both rhetoric and violent actions have escalated between these two groups and their allies and proxies in Lebanon in the past year. They are also engaged in combat inside Syria, where Hizbullah and Iran support the Bashar Assad regime and Sunni Salafist groups from Lebanon are fighting to bring down the Damascus regime.
In recent months this confrontation has spread from its previously geographically contained context of Tripoli in north Lebanon, the border regions of north-east Lebanon and areas around Sidon in the south. Several rocket and car bomb attacks in Hizbullah’s heartland of southern Beirut in recent months, followed by the assassination of a leading military commander, took this battle directly into Hizbullah’s home district. The car bombing of the Iranian embassy last month escalated this trend, which shattered the previous, apparently unwritten understanding that the two main camps in Lebanon would fight out their battles in Syria or outside Beirut.
It would seem logical to see today’s attack as the natural corollary to those recent attacks against Iranian and Hizbullah targets. Whoever carried out the attack may have intended to send twin messages: Those who attack March 8’s heartland should expect revenge attacks, and the heart of the March 14 group is now fair game for such attacks. The area of the attack is a jewel in the crown of the Hariri-led revitalization of central Beirut, and includes hundreds of millions of dollars in investments in luxury apartments, upscale hotels, waterfront marinas and commercial complexes. Hariri’s home and the central meeting place of the March 14 group is also located nearby. It symbolizes everything that March 14 promises for Lebanon’s future in terms of investments, jobs, prosperity and modernity, but once again it is the site of a major assassination that reminds all Lebanese that they still lack a consensus on exactly what kind of future they seek for their country.
Chatah was the target because of his stature within March 14 as a leading thinker and international interlocutor, a close adviser and confidant of Saad Hariri, and an outspoken critic of Syria, Hizbullah and March 8. In his last tweet just hours before his death, he said, “Hezbollah is pressing hard to be granted similar powers in security & foreign policy matters that Syria exercised in Lebanon for 15 yrs.”
This was a reference to the slow-motion discussions with President Michel Suleiman and others to form a new Lebanese government, which has been held up by disagreement between the two camps on how to allocate cabinet seats so that all parties are represented but neither of the two main camps can single-handedly dominate decision-making.
Accusations quickly materialized about who would have wanted to do this, from Syria and Hizbullah allies, to Saudi Arabia, to Salafist-takfiris, along with some voices wondering whether some other party did this to stoke sectarian tensions by making this appear like Syrian-Iranian-Hizbullah retaliation. Local reports also quoted March 14 sources as saying Chatah's assassination could have been due to the approaching January 16 start date of the Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL) trial of five persons associated with Hizbullah who are accused of being involved in the 2005 assassination of the late former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri. They said that Chatah was preparing for a televised interview about the STL.
The tragedy of Lebanon remains that most of these theories could be plausible, but we will have to wait for the evidence and the investigation to provide more clarity on the possible perpetrators. The attack today immediately sent shivers throughout all of Lebanon, which again lives in fear of serial retaliations. The symbolism of the bombing location means that the gloves are off, and any part of the country is now a fair target for the many killers out there. Rami G. Khouri is Editor-at-large of The Daily Star, and Director of the Issam Fares Institute for Public Policy and International Affairs at the American University of Beirut, in Beirut, Lebanon. You can follow him @ramikhouri. Copyright © 2013 Rami G. Khouri—distributed by Agence Global